LSAS Platform Intelligence / United States

AI regulation, with the evidence in view.

Browse state legislation sources and reported milestones. Source inventories are published separately from reviewed legal interpretations and technical control mappings.

50-state navigationPublished sources; legal analysis is separateSource view: 2026-11-07 (UTC)

Regulatory Pulse is provided for informational purposes only, not legal advice or a compliance determination. Publishing a source does not establish legal review or applicability to your organization. Coverage may be incomplete or out of date; no complete or current coverage is guaranteed. Verify the current official text, amendments, effective dates and exceptions, and consult qualified legal counsel before acting. Technical control mappings, where separately reviewed, address only the stated part of an obligation.

Source inventories publish selected instruments, source-reported statuses and source references. They do not represent approved legal analysis. Obligation interpretations and control mappings are shown only when separately reviewed.

34States with published sources
57Published instruments
76Published source records
48Source-reported signed / enacted / final
8Source-reported introduced / in progress / passed / proposed
1Source-reported failed / vetoed / withdrawn

Source-reported status does not establish legal effect. Temporal screening of reviewed analysis uses a conservative state civil date, not a precise legal effective instant. Counts describe this published inventory, not the total number of laws in the United States. “—” means coverage has not been established.

Explore state coverage

Explore the 50 statesAlaska and Hawaii are inset. Published source inventories and reviewed coverage are distinct; neither establishes legal safety or complete coverage. An equivalent searchable state list follows the map.
Published source inventoryReviewed coverageLimited reviewed coverageNot yet reviewedNo matching published records

Source publication is separate from legal interpretation. These are selected inventories, not complete state coverage. A state with no published records may still have applicable laws.

Browse all 50 states
AlabamaNot reviewedAlaskaNot reviewedArizona2 instruments · Sources onlyArkansas2 instruments · Sources onlyCalifornia11 instruments · Sources onlyColorado3 instruments · Sources onlyConnecticut1 instruments · Sources onlyDelaware1 instruments · Sources onlyFlorida1 instruments · Sources onlyGeorgia1 instruments · Sources onlyHawaii1 instruments · Sources onlyIdahoNot reviewedIllinois2 instruments · Sources onlyIndiana1 instruments · Sources onlyIowa1 instruments · Sources onlyKansasNot reviewedKentucky1 instruments · Sources onlyLouisiana2 instruments · Sources onlyMaine1 instruments · Sources onlyMaryland2 instruments · Sources onlyMassachusetts1 instruments · Sources onlyMichigan1 instruments · Sources onlyMinnesota2 instruments · Sources onlyMississippiNot reviewedMissouriNot reviewedMontanaNot reviewedNebraskaNot reviewedNevada1 instruments · Sources onlyNew Hampshire1 instruments · Sources onlyNew Jersey2 instruments · Sources onlyNew MexicoNot reviewedNew York1 instruments · Sources onlyNorth Carolina2 instruments · Sources onlyNorth DakotaNot reviewedOhioNot reviewedOklahomaNot reviewedOregon1 instruments · Sources onlyPennsylvania1 instruments · Sources onlyRhode Island1 instruments · Sources onlySouth CarolinaNot reviewedSouth DakotaNot reviewedTennessee2 instruments · Sources onlyTexas1 instruments · Sources onlyUtah2 instruments · Sources onlyVermont1 instruments · Sources onlyVirginia2 instruments · Sources onlyWashington1 instruments · Sources onlyWest VirginiaNot reviewedWisconsin1 instruments · Sources onlyWyomingNot reviewed

Geography: U.S. Census Bureau, via U.S. Atlas (opens in a new tab). Alaska and Hawaii are shown as insets.

Filter legislation

Reset filters

Filters apply to published instruments and any separately reviewed analysis. Obligation, industry, role and use-case filters require reviewed interpretation. Unresolved dates are retained in source detail and excluded from a specified date window.

Legislation and rulemaking

Published instruments and source-reported legislative milestones
InstrumentReported legislative statusSource-reported milestonesSources retrieved

Florida · Bill · S0482

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Failed

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedOct 9, 2026

Georgia · Statute · SB540

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

AI companion chatbot disclosures and safeguards (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Enacted

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedNov 3, 2026

Hawaii · Bill · SB3001 / Act 248

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

Artificial Intelligence Disclosure and Safety Act (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Signed

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedOct 23, 2026

Iowa · Statute · SF2417 / Chapter 1068

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

Conversational AI service requirements and safeguards (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Enacted

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedNov 3, 2026

Illinois · Bill · HB3773 / Public Act 103-0804

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

AI in employment (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Enacted

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedOct 23, 2026

Illinois · Bill · SB0315 / Public Act 104-0538

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Enacted

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedOct 23, 2026

Indiana · Bill · SEA150 / SB150

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

Artificial intelligence and cybersecurity (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Signed

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedOct 28, 2026

Kentucky · Statute · SB4 / Acts Chapter 66

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

Government AI governance and synthetic election communications (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Enacted

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedNov 3, 2026

Louisiana · Bill · HB475 / Act 649

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

AI transcription; healthcare recording disclosure (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Signed

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedOct 31, 2026

Louisiana · Bill · HB459 / Act 806

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

Artificial intelligence disclosures in political campaigns (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Signed

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedOct 31, 2026

Massachusetts · Bill · H4744 / Acts of 2024, Chapter 118

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

An Act to prevent abuse and exploitation (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Signed

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedOct 28, 2026

Maryland · Bill · SB818 / Chapter 496

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

Information Technology - Artificial Intelligence - Policies and Procedures (Artificial Intelligence Governance Act of 2024) (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Signed

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedOct 28, 2026

Maryland · Bill · SB8 / Chapter 445

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

Criminal Law - Identity Fraud - Artificial Intelligence and Deepfake Representations (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Signed

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedOct 28, 2026

Maine · Statute · 10 MRSA §1500-DD

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

Consumer AI chatbot disclosure (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Enacted

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedOct 23, 2026

Michigan · Statute · Act 11 of 2025

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

Protection from Intimate Deep Fakes Act (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Enacted

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedNov 2, 2026

Minnesota · Statute · Minn. Stat. § 325M.14

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

Consumer personal data rights and automated-decision profiling (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Enacted

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedOct 28, 2026

Minnesota · Statute · Minn. Stat. § 609.771

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

Use of deepfake technology to influence elections (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Enacted

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedOct 28, 2026

North Carolina · Bill · HB1161

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

Omnibus artificial intelligence protections (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
In progress

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedOct 31, 2026

North Carolina · Bill · SB963

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

AI chatbots: licensing, safety and privacy (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
In progress

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedOct 31, 2026

New Hampshire · Statute · RSA Chapter 5-D

Source inventory · No legal interpretation

Use of artificial intelligence by state agencies (source link, opens in a new tab)

State sources
Enacted

Source-reported status. Status does not establish that every provision is effective.

Dates not establishedNov 2, 2026

Source-reported milestones

Introduction, signature, commencement, effective dates and compliance deadlines are distinct events. Review the source for provision-specific or conditional dates.

  1. May 1, 2026 · introduction

    Colorado · SB189

    Automated Decision-Making Technology

    Source-reported milestone; legal effect has not been interpreted.

    LegiScan metadata: SB189 — history[0]Open source (opens in a new tab)
    “{ "date": "2026-05-01", "action": "Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Business, Labor, & Technology", "chamber": "S", "chamber_id": 22, "importance": 1 }”

    Exact normalized source span 2818–3005.

    Source SHA-256: d7ddf21ea41f04454f637101d6389e3cb10082e34a51a850282b10e9c4d571a5

  2. May 7, 2026 · introduction

    Colorado · SB189

    Automated Decision-Making Technology

    Source-reported milestone; legal effect has not been interpreted.

    LegiScan metadata: SB189 — history[5]Open source (opens in a new tab)
    “{ "date": "2026-05-07", "action": "Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary", "chamber": "H", "chamber_id": 21, "importance": 1 }”

    Exact normalized source span 3811–3977.

    Source SHA-256: d7ddf21ea41f04454f637101d6389e3cb10082e34a51a850282b10e9c4d571a5

  3. May 14, 2026 · signature

    Colorado · SB189

    Automated Decision-Making Technology

    Source-reported milestone; legal effect has not been interpreted.

    LegiScan metadata: SB189 — history[14]Open source (opens in a new tab)
    “{ "date": "2026-05-14", "action": "Governor Signed", "chamber": "", "chamber_id": 0, "importance": 1 }”

    Exact normalized source span 5424–5560.

    Source SHA-256: d7ddf21ea41f04454f637101d6389e3cb10082e34a51a850282b10e9c4d571a5

Why the boundary matters

Legislative activity. Separate from applicability.

Independent research provides context. It does not measure LSAS performance or customer results.

1,539State AI bills introduced

State AI bills introduced during 2026, as reported through early October.

National Conference of State Legislatures · 2026 · Independent research

Source & measurement context
As Congress Deliberates, States Lead the Way on AI Regulation (opens in a new tab)

Published 2026-10-21. Verified 2026-11-03.

2026 legislative activity through early October 2026; exact cutoff not specified.

U.S. state AI legislation reported by NCSL. A count of legislative activity, not a percentage.

  • Introduction is not enactment; enactment does not establish effective dates or applicability to a business.
  • The article describes 280 as enacted in 2026. Its separate enacted-and-adopted wording concerns 2025.
  • These national figures do not measure LSAS source coverage or executable policy coverage.

280State AI bills enacted

State AI bills enacted during 2026, as reported through early October.

National Conference of State Legislatures · 2026 · Independent research

Source & measurement context
As Congress Deliberates, States Lead the Way on AI Regulation (opens in a new tab)

Published 2026-10-21. Verified 2026-11-03.

2026 legislative activity through early October 2026; exact cutoff not specified.

U.S. state AI legislation reported by NCSL. A count of legislative activity, not a percentage.

  • Introduction is not enactment; enactment does not establish effective dates or applicability to a business.
  • The article describes 280 as enacted in 2026. Its separate enacted-and-adopted wording concerns 2025.
  • These national figures do not measure LSAS source coverage or executable policy coverage.

From Regulatory Pulse to execution

A source is the beginning.
Evidence closes the loop.

The published source edition in this site contains 34 states. Research coverage is separate from reviewed obligations, approved controls and runtime enforcement.

Conceptual architecture · The complete jurisdiction-to-execution loop is in development.

  1. 01

    Discover

    Available research

    Published legislation sources and reported milestones.

  2. 02

    Interpret

    Human review required

    Confirm applicability and effective obligations with qualified reviewers.

  3. 03

    Approve

    Separate authorization

    Record the accountable interpretation and accepted residual gaps.

  4. 04

    Configure

    Candidate mapping

    Jurisdiction-specific controls require reviewed, released policy packs.

  5. 05

    Enforce

    Qualified integration

    Exercise supported runtime controls against the approved scope.

  6. 06

    Prove

    Bounded evidence

    Inspect actual decisions, effects where verified, and unresolved obligations.

Inspect the Colorado candidate and its boundaries

Draft mapping: lsas-co-ai-data-safeguards@0.1.0. The repository candidate references the Colorado Privacy Act security duty, C.R.S. §6-1-1308(5), recorded effective July 1, 2023. It maps selected sensitive-data patterns to existing baseline controls with partial support. This is a proposed technical mapping, not a demonstration of Colorado compliance.

Colorado Title 6 statutes (PDF, opens in a new tab) · Repository source capture: October 10, 2026. Legal applicability and an authorized interpretation still require human review.

No signed jurisdiction release is installed in this source edition. This candidate is separate from the newer AI/ADMT framework. Notices, consumer rights, appeals, contracts and a full security program are not established by pattern checks. Design-partner validation remains pending.

A policy name, IP address, server location or selected state cannot establish legal applicability. Source research, policy approval and observed enforcement are distinct.

Explore supported runtime authority

Understand your exposure before choosing controls

A paid Discovery assessment examines the AI systems, data flows, activities and governance gaps in your environment. Use the published jurisdiction sources and any separately reviewed analysis as a starting point for scoping, alongside your legal and business owners.

Discuss a Discovery assessment

Discovery covers up to three environments; Expanded Discovery covers up to six. Contact for Pricing. Discovery does not certify legal compliance.

Review assessment scope and pricing

An open invitation

Help shape the future of AI governance.

The challenges organizations face with AI aren’t theoretical. We’re learning from the people navigating them every day.

If you work in governance, risk, compliance, enterprise architecture, security, or AI engineering, we’d welcome your perspective.

Share Your Perspective

A conversation, not a sales pitch.